Balaclava Image Deep Throttle Logo
Auto Racing History Image
HOME THOUGHTS ESSAYS RANKINGS HISTORY
About Us
Russell's Ramblings
IMSA Thoughts
Photos
F1 Schedule
Master Schedule
Debunking Myths
News Links
Shopping
Ed Donath Archive
Guestbook
In Association with Amazon.com

Uncensored CART Commentary
by Ed Donath

A Standing Invitation?
10 reasons why standing starts are wrong for CART
8/25/02

ATHENS, NY—In the wake of a spate of first-lap/first-turn incidents and attempted jump-the-guns there has been more and more murmuring lately about CART changing over to standing starts. The truth of the matter is that ultra-competitive racing and the recklessness of a small number of Champ Car pilots have been to blame for the carnage; a problem that wouldn’t be nearly as acute if there were 10 more cars in the fields like there used to be.

Without even invoking the “it-ain’t-broke-so-don’t-fix-it” clause or reminding fans of our beloved speed sport that there are already too few traditions left for Grandpa Chris to mess with, here are 10 reasons why CART should retain its flying start format:

  1. The Pace Car Unit is, after all, the only division of the Champ Car Company that has never cast a negative reflection on CART. Why penalize it? For most of the pace cars’ history they have been the promotional/advertising arm and custom paint-job showcase of CART’s former series sponsor, PPG, while serving double duty by giving exposure to various engine manufacturers’ passenger vehicles. Thousands of miles of accident-free rent-a-rides, VIP hot laps and, of course, actual pacing—conducted ostensibly by professional female drivers—has produced neither injury nor litigation. This is a most impressive and commendable record that tells a wonderful PR story-within-a-story.
  2. By curtailing pace car activity, the salability of sponsorship(s) for the aforementioned program—and the revenue it produces—would be diminished. Also, when the promised next wave of “engine manufacturers” (read: badge buyers) comes on board, those carmakers will certainly want, and deserve to have, as much exposure as possible for their showroom vehicles. One lesson that should have been well learned as a result of Honda deciding to bail, in part, because of shabby treatment is that CART’s engine partners deserve to be featured prominently and as often as possible during race weekends.
  3. Eliminating rolling starts would also eliminate one of the fuzzy distinctions between CART and F1. There is already too much identity confusion between CART and f-inheritor, so why create new mix-ups?
  4. Tire temperature—now more than ever before, as a result of new mandatory pit stop rules and the fact that the FedEx Championship Series is a one-tire deal—is historically CART’s single biggest speed/handling inhibitor. The various Handford Devices rank a distant second. Going to standing starts would literally force tire-warming technology to be brought into play. Aren’t we trying to save money here, not spend more?
  5. “First Turn Bottleneck Crash Syndrome” will not be eliminated by going to standing starts because the same number of cars will still be reaching the same dangerous point on the circuit at the same time. FTBCS, as you know, is the primary cause of L1CI—First Lap Contact Incidents.
  6. Standing starts are not a guarantee against catastrophic first-lap multi-car crashes. In the last decade, F1 has red-flagged and re-started more races than CART. Only one of the two FedEx Championship Series races re-started in the last 10 years was on a street or road circuit (’95 Molson Indy Vancouver). The other was the infamous crash that occurred just before the field reached the start/finish line to take the green flag at the inaugural US 500 at Michigan Speedway in 1996.
  7. Speaking of ovals: While there aren’t too many of those left on the CART schedule, the remaining speedway events certainly must continue to incorporate flying starts.
  8. Pace cars are, first and foremost, safety vehicles; in motorsports it is always better to err on the side of safety. Even standing start-oriented ForMoola One now uses its once-dreaded safety cars pretty frequently.
  9. Standing starts are rougher on the equipment and the pocketbook—especially clutches, gearboxes and drive components—than flying starts. Furthermore, they have historically been the breeding ground for illegal traction aids in series that employ them.
  10. Interesting strategic nuances of Champ Car racing such as parade lap “pit stops” and “getting a jump on the field” would be lost with standing starts. Be honest: How often do you find yourself rooting for the smartest team and driver to snatch a victory from the fastest?

Copyright © 2002 by Ed Donath and Deep Throttle. All Rights Reserved.

Ed Donath Archive

 
Site Index | Search | Contacts | Ad Rates |


Copyright © 1999-2024 by Deep Throttle. All Rights Reserved.
The names, logos, and taglines identifying Deep Throttle are proprietary marks of Deep Throttle. All other trademarks and service marks are property of their respective owners. Deep Throttle is an independent electronic publication and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any series, team, driver, or sponsor. Privacy Policy.